i am exiled from the good land
i am exiled from the good land
i would summarize god's character as "worthy of imitation"
god is worthy of obedience
and worthy of imitation
what god is like is always "what to be like"
-
we can imagine someone worthy of obedience who is not worthy of imitation
"do as i say, not as i do"
they are wise and right enough, or powerful enough, such that it's a good idea to obey them
but someone is only worthy of imitation when it is good to be like them
god is king of kings and lord of lords, but also exemplar of exemplars
-
if our final destination is to be conformed to the image of the messiah (romans 8:29), and we are instructed to be imitators of god (ephesians 5:1), to imitate people as they imitate the messiah (1 corinthians 11:1), to be complete as our heavenly father is complete (matthew 5:48), and so on, then the character of god is always such that it would be good for us to be like that
if god is angry, it must be an anger worthy of imitation.
if god hates sin, it must be a hatred worthy of imitation.
basically, i am suspicious of the idea that god's ways are not our ways to the point that god's goodness is unrecognizable to us as good - especially because we presume that there are exceptions for god that would be unacceptable for humans
of course i get where that's coming from, but we are also told to be imitators of god
so, again, what god is like is "worthy of imitation"
and there are many portraits and concepts of god which are far from good examples.
i keep coming back to improv
i think it's because improv is this game we can inhabit to embody openness
openness, spontaneity, surrender, attentiveness, and curiosity, rather than an imposed structure of control
that is what is so appealing about saying "yes and." that humour and beauty and joy and something wonderful could come from just being here enough to see what's available to play with - without pre-planning an ideal outcome or a way to get there.
-
however, i've been thinking about a possible counterpart to "yes and"-ing, which is going along
that is, a kind of "yes" without an "and." this is saying yes to every first good idea, jumping onto every bit, leading to incoherence
and directionlessness eventually invites the dream of structure and hierarchy and institutionalization and optimizing.
which may be true
but i think there's something about how rather than needing to say "no," or discerning what to say no to (which is still important, don't get me wrong)
we can be mindful of how there's always multiple things to say "yes, and" to in every offer
like it's not about NOT saying "no" to an offer that seems immediately revulsive and unfunny to you
but about saying "yes" to the other interesting things going on - the other, perhaps more subtle, invitations there
(there's always interesting things going on)
the thing about yin (surrender) and yang (determination)
is that sometimes we deceive ourselves about being in yin,
and we exert as much energy trying to surrender
and lying to ourselves about what we're okay with
as it would have taken to change our circumstances
if we were not so afraid
1. self-compassion is a wide-enough home for all of you to live in.
2. compassion is recursive. you can have compassion on your complete inability to have compassion for yourself.
3. compassion is not primarily about trying to put up with yourself. it is about releasing the stories that tell us we need to be put up with.
love says "it matters that you're around" - and means it
love says "it's good that god made you" - and means it
"How Being 'Hard On Ourselves' Sabotages Long-Term Discipline (And What To Do Instead)
"You Can’t Simply Decide to Be a Different Person"
"the way to spend less time on this app is to prepare more interesting sources of interaction and information, and allow your focus to shift automatically" / "btw I think this is the way to get things done in general, using interest, desire, and attraction instead of discipline or self-control" - @ftlsid
a collection of links on nice guy-ism as a defense mechanism:
interesting bc this is the kind of stuff i'd be more curious about but it really does seem to contradict a lot of my foundational beliefs re: the way of jesus, eschatological/resurrection gender, etc.
gosh im confused
keywords: memetics, psychofauna, social contagion, social construction
improv is a kind of forgiveness meditation
improv without forgiveness is impossible
and vice versa
surrendering to unconditional acceptance of reality
some notes on first reformed: